Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565924›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2025

Partial Enteral Nutrition in the Management of Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aleksandra Jatkowska, Bernadette White, Konstantinos Gkikas, John Paul Seenan, Jonathan MacDonald, Konstantinos Gerasimidis

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandra JatkowskaHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-4548
Bernadette WhiteHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Konstantinos GkikasHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
John Paul SeenanHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jonathan MacDonaldHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Konstantinos GerasimidisHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9432-2200

Funding

Universtity of Glasgow and Nestle Health Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExclusive enteral nutrition is an established treatment for active Crohn's disease but the role of partial enteral nutrition (PEN) in the broader management of the disease is less clear. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the literature on the role of PEN in Crohn's disease management.

methodsThis review was conducted following Cochrane recommendations. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Findings were reported following the PRISMA guidelines.

resultsSixty-four articles were identified, of which 11 reported data from randomized control trials. Good quality evidence suggests that PEN may be used as a maintenance and induction therapy, particularly at high dosages and/or alongside exclusion diets. A higher dosage of PEN is associated with a lower risk of subsequent disease relapse, with benefits observed at intakes above 35% of energy requirements (35%-50% PEN: OR [95% confidence intervals (CI)]: 0.42 [0.27-0.65]; > 50% PEN: OR [95% CI]: 0.27 [0.08-0.88]). Low-quality evidence suggests that postoperative use of PEN may prevent disease recurrence or enhance treatment outcomes when used as adjunct therapy to biologics. PEN can improve nutritional parameters, showing efficacy comparable to EEN in pediatric patients (weight: OR [95% CI]: -0.04 [-0.32, 0.25]). The effect of PEN on improving patients' quality of life is comparable to that of EEN and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapies.

conclusionsPartial enteral nutrition may help in various aspects of Crohn's disease management but much of the current evidence is of low quality. Well-designed randomized control trials are required to confirm findings from current literature and before clinical recommendations can be made.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseEnteral NutritionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicbiologicsCrohn's DiseaseEnteral nutritionnutritional therapy

Identifiers

PMID39565924
PMCPMC12087569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.