Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565897›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2024

"Scientists are People too": Biology Students Relate More to Scientists When They are Humanized in Course Materials.

Elizabeth H Schultheis, Ash T Zemenick, Rachel M Youngblood, Robin A Costello, Emily P Driessen, Melissa K Kjelvik, Marjorie G Weber, Cissy J Ballen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DataVersify: A Framework for Data Literacy Instruction Featuring Scientist Stories.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth H SchultheisKellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060.
Ash T ZemenickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Rachel M YoungbloodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.
Robin A CostelloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.
Emily P DriessenDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Melissa K KjelvikKellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060.
Marjorie G WeberDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Cissy J BallenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Featuring scientists in classroom materials provides opportunities for students to relate to scientists as role models and see themselves in science. However, it is unclear what information students find most relatable when encountering scientists throughout their education. In this study, we manipulated the amount and type of information provided about scientists featured in biology courses. Within the context of activities focused on a scientist's research study and data, we provided students with either no personal information about the scientist (Control treatment), pictures of the scientist (Visual treatment), or pictures and humanizing details about the scientist (Humanizing treatment). We asked students to describe how they related to the featured scientist, and qualitatively coded responses. Results showed that students related to the scientist's 1) professional research interests (e.g., research topic, science as a career) and 2) personal information (e.g., life experiences, hobbies, personality characteristics, race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status). In addition, we observed differences in how students related to scientists across our treatments. Students were twice as likely to relate to featured scientists, and related in a greater variety of ways, when course materials included personal, humanizing information. We discuss implications for curriculum development and call for intentionality in how we present scientists throughout biology education.

Indexed as

BiologyCurriculumScienceStudentsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39565897
PMCPMC11659862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.