ArticleDiabetes care2025
Cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Real-world, 2-Year Prospective Study.
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Longitudinal Community Health Worker-Led Interventions for Improving Hypertension Management in Urban U.S. Communities: A Rapid Review.AJPM focus · 2026Review
- Prediabetes: The Looming Burden for Australia.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Type 2 diabetes prevention across the life course.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Weight maintenance after discontinuation of GLP-1 therapies.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Comment on Echouffo-Tcheugui et al. Is the Current Lifestyle Modification Approach to Diabetes Prevention in the U.S. a Success? Diabetes Care 2025;48:863-870.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- A Context-Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (Small Steps for Big Changes) in Australia: Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Prediabetes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Is the Current Lifestyle Modification Approach to Diabetes Prevention in the U.S. a Success?Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Piezoelectric-immunomodulatory electrospun membrane for enhanced repair of refractory wounds.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) for people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe performed difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level health insurance claims and survey data for 5,948 adults with prediabetes who enrolled (n = 575) or did not enroll (n = 5,373) in the NDPP to assess NDPP's effects on health economic outcomes. We assessed direct medical costs for the year before the NDPP enrollment/index date and for 2 years thereafter; EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years. We used propensity score weighting to adjust for potential bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputation to handle missing data, and bootstrapping to produce CIs. We adopted a health care sector perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars.
resultsCompared with nonenrollees, each NDPP enrollee had an average reduction of $4,552 (95% CI -13,231, 2,014) in 2-year total direct medical costs. Cost savings were primarily related to hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency room visits. Compared with nonenrollees, each enrollee had no difference in EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 2 years or QALYs gained over 2 years. The uncertainty analyses found that enrollment in the NDPP had an 88% probability of saving money and 84% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained over 2 years.
conclusionsIn this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.