Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565812›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Association between the use of Information and Communication Technology and activeness in life among community-dwelling older adults.

Kanna Tezuka, Yachiyo Sasaki, Midori Shirai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kanna TezukaGraduate School of Nursing, Osaka Metropeolitan University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-6449-9499
Yachiyo SasakiSchool of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Midori ShiraiGraduate School of Nursing, Osaka Metropeolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the association between the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and activeness in life among community-dwelling older adults. A self-administered, unmarked questionnaire survey was conducted among individuals aged 60 years or older who were registered with Silver Human Resource Centers or Senior citizen clubs in a city in Osaka Prefecture. The survey collected data on participants, demographic characteristics, health status, ICT use, and activeness in life (particularly expansion of life space, exercise habits, motivation, and social activities). ICT use was defined as the use of any mobile devices to connect to the Internet, such as smartphones, tablets, or wearable devices. A logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between ICT use and activeness in life after adjusting for confounding factors. A total of 892 responses were used in the analysis. The results revealed that the odds ratios (ORs) for expansion of life space (1.84) and motivation (2.17) were significantly higher for the group of participants using ICT use than for the group of participants not using ICT. In contrast, ICT use was not associated with exercise habits and social activities. Overall, this study clarified that ICT use is significantly associated with the expansion of life space and motivation among community-dwelling older adults. In particularly, ICT use may increase mental activity, inferred from the highest OR value for motivation noted in the current results. In conclusion, ICT use can enhance activeness in life among community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

ExerciseIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInformation TechnologyJapanMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39565812
PMCPMC11578520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.