ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Cross-border use of health services: An exploratory mixed-methods project at the Mexico-Guatemala border.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-border use of health services has been studied mainly as travel from high- to low- and middle-income countries ("medical tourism"). The movement between low- and middle-income countries has been less studied. The objectives were; 1) to describe the frequency, types of services used, and health needs associated with cross-border utilization of health services at the Mexico-Guatemala border; 2) to explore the drivers of cross-border use among people living in this area. We conducted a mixed-methods study. The quantitative component was a probability survey of border crossers (March to April 2023, analysis sample n = 4,733, weighted n = 74,228). The qualitative component consisted of 28 semi-structured interviews with users and providers of health services living close to the international border (May-June 2023). Descriptive results were obtained separately and triangulated. 3.8% (CI 95% 3.1,4.7) in the sample were crossing the border for the purpose of seeking health care or purchasing medicines, 7.4% (CI 95% 5.9,9.2) had crossed the border in the past year to seek care, and 21.8% (CI 95% 18.8,25.1) to purchase medicines. According to quantitative and qualitative results, those living in Mexico were more likely to cross the border to seek care than those living in Guatemala, independent of country of birth, while crossing to Mexico to buy medicine was more common than crossing to Guatemala for the same reason. Public and private services were accessed in similar proportions, the former mostly for preventive care (vaccination) and the latter for specialized care. Qualitative results showed that the main drivers of cross-border health care use were perceived quality and geographical availability. The main drivers of cross-border buying of medicines were affordability and perceived quality. The use of private services can benefit the local economy. The use of public services for preventive purposes can be an asset for health promotion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.