Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565622›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

American College of Surgeons Operative Standards and Breast Cancer Outcomes.

Crystal D Taylor, Ton Wang, Alison S Baskin, Brandy Sinco, Tasha M Hughes, Daniel J Boffa, Judy C Boughey, Lesly A Dossett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TROP2-targeted NIR-II fluorescence imaging for visualizing surgical margins and metastatic sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crystal D TaylorDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Ton WangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Alison S BaskinDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Brandy SincoCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Tasha M HughesDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Daniel J BoffaDepartment of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Judy C BougheyAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Research Program, Chicago, Illinois.
Lesly A DossettDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Evaluation of the Implementation and Effectiveness of the American College of Surgeons Operative Standards ProgramR01CA288625 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Daniel J Boffa, LESLY A DOSSETT · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA288625NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) operative standards were established to detail critical elements of cancer surgery, reduce technical variation, and improve outcomes. Two of the 6 operative standards target adequate axillary surgery for breast cancer. The potential association of the operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes, such as nodal yield and nodal positivity rates, is currently unknown. Objective: To evaluate the potential association of the ACS operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes in breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was performed using data on 1 201 317 women 18 years or older who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for invasive breast cancer from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patients were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a clinical oncology database encompassing approximately 70% of new cancer diagnoses, sourced from hospital registry data from 1317 facilities. Statistical analysis was performed from October 2023 to June 2024. Exposure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy or ALND. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reliability-adjusted facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity rate for each procedure were calculated using generalized linear mixed models, Poisson regression, and logistic regression with facility-level random intercepts. Results: The cohort included 1 201 317 women with a median age of 62 years (IQR, 53-70 years). Facility-level nodal yield ranged from 1 to 6 for SLNB and from 6 to 22 for ALND. Median facility-level nodal yield for SLNB was 2.6 (IQR, 2.3-3.0) and the nodal positivity rate for SLNB was 12.2% (IQR, 11.0%-13.7%), with rates ranging from 6% to 21%. A weak correlation between facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.17). Median nodal upstaging rate (≥4 positive nodes) for ALND was 30.5% (IQR, 26.5%-35.0%), with rates ranging from 11% to 54%; median nodal yield was 12.2 (IQR, 10.9-13.6). A strong correlation between nodal yield and nodal upstaging rates was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.53). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of women undergoing axillary surgery for invasive breast cancer, facility-level variation in lymph node yield was present for both SLNB and ALND, which could potentially be improved through the ACS operative standards. However, this variation had mixed associations with nodal positivity and upstaging rates, suggesting the association of the ACS operative standards with oncologic outcomes may be mixed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAxillaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSocieties, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39565622
PMCPMC11579798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.