Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565619›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2024

Creating an Empirical Dermatology Dataset Through Crowdsourcing With Web Search Advertisements.

Abbi Ward, Jimmy Li, Julie Wang, Sriram Lakshminarasimhan, Ashley Carrick, Bilson Campana, Jay Hartford, Pradeep K Sreenivasaiah, Tiya Tiyasirisokchai, Sunny Virmani and 11 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DermIDS: Dermatology imaging data structure for scalable and interoperable AI systems.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Abbi WardGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Jimmy LiGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Julie WangGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Sriram LakshminarasimhanGoogle Research, Bengaluru, India.
Ashley CarrickGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Bilson CampanaGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Jay HartfordGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Pradeep K SreenivasaiahGoogle Research, Bengaluru, India.
Tiya TiyasirisokchaiGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Sunny VirmaniGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Renee WongGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Yossi MatiasGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Greg S CorradoGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Dale R WebsterGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Margaret Ann SmithStanford Healthcare AI Applied Research Team, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Dawn SiegelDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford California.
Steven LinStanford Healthcare AI Applied Research Team, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Justin KoDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford California.
Alan KarthikesalingamGoogle Research, London, UK.
Christopher SemtursGoogle Research, Mountain View, California.
Pooja RaoGoogle Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Health datasets from clinical sources do not reflect the breadth and diversity of disease, impacting research, medical education, and artificial intelligence tool development. Assessments of novel crowdsourcing methods to create health datasets are needed. Objective: To evaluate if web search advertisements (ads) are effective at creating a diverse and representative dermatology image dataset. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational survey study, conducted from March to November 2023, used Google Search ads to invite internet users in the US to contribute images of dermatology conditions with demographic and symptom information to the Skin Condition Image Network (SCIN) open access dataset. Ads were displayed against dermatology-related search queries on mobile devices, inviting contributions from adults after a digital informed consent process. Contributions were filtered for image safety and measures were taken to protect privacy. Data analysis occurred January to February 2024. Exposure: Dermatologist condition labels as well as estimated Fitzpatrick Skin Type (eFST) and estimated Monk Skin Tone (eMST) labels. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary metrics of interest were the number, quality, demographic diversity, and distribution of clinical conditions in the crowdsourced contributions. Spearman rank order correlation was used for all correlation analyses, and the χ2 test was used to analyze differences between SCIN contributor demographics and the US census. Results: In total, 5749 submissions were received, with a median of 22 (14-30) per day. Of these, 5631 (97.9%) were genuine images of dermatological conditions. Among contributors with self-reported demographic information, female contributors (1732 of 2596 contributors [66.7%]) and younger contributors (1329 of 2556 contributors [52.0%] aged <40 years) had a higher representation in the dataset compared with the US population. Of 2614 contributors who reported race and ethnicity, 852 (32.6%) reported a racial or ethnic identity other than White. Dermatologist confidence in assigning a differential diagnosis increased with the number of self-reported demographic and skin-condition-related variables (Spearman R = 0.1537; P < .001). Of 4019 contributions reporting duration since onset, 2170 (54.0%) reported onset within less than 7 days of submission. Of the 2835 contributions that could be assigned a dermatological differential diagnosis, 2523 (89.0%) were allergic, infectious, or inflammatory conditions. eFST and eMST distributions reflected the geographical origin of the dataset. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this survey study suggest that search ads are effective at crowdsourcing dermatology images and could therefore be a useful method to create health datasets. The SCIN dataset bridges important gaps in the availability of images of common, short-duration skin conditions.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCrowdsourcingInternetAdultDatasets as TopicDermatologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSearch EngineSkin DiseasesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39565619
PMCPMC11579799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.