ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Improvement and Recovery of Intestinal Flora Disorder Caused by Ciprofloxacin Using Lactic Acid Bacteria.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, synthesis, and antibacterial assessment of a new series of ciprofloxacin-based compounds as possible dual DNA gyrase/topoisomerase IV inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Probiotic Action Against Gastrointestinal Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, four lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains demonstrating ciprofloxacin, bile salt, gastric fluid, and intestinal fluid tolerance as well as adhesion ability to Caco-2 and HT-29 cells were used to improve and recover the intestinal flora disorders caused by ciprofloxacin, among which, Lactobacillus brevis 505 exhibited excellent adhesion ability to two kinds of cells and colonization ability to mouse intestinal. After ciprofloxacin treatment, certain recovery effect on cecum caused by ciprofloxacin in the mice was found during natural recovery (group 5C2), but it was challenging to fully restore the intestinal integrity to the initial level. After L. brevis 505 intervention (group 5C5), the intestinal damage to the colon and ileum caused by ciprofloxacin in mice was significantly alleviated; the recovery effect was better than that of natural recovery. Additionally, L. brevis 505 could effectively regulate INF-γ, sIgA, and RegIIIγ increase induced by ciprofloxacin. Shannon and Simpson index of the intestinal flora of mice in 5C5 group were higher than those in other group, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the mice in 5C5 group was increased, indicating that LAB can better restore the structure and abundance of intestinal microflora. Consequently, L. brevis 505 shows promise as a probiotic for gut microbiota restoration and rebuilding during antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.