Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Quality of life and testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients: long-term data from a phase III trial.
Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim was to compare quality of life (QoL) of patients with testosterone recovery (TR) to patients without TR after the completion of either 18- or 36-month androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer.
methodsFrom a Phase III trial, we selected all 630 randomised patients with testosterone measured at baseline (during screening, before randomisation) and follow-up and who completed baseline, 6-month and, at least, one further QoL questionnaire in follow-up (EORTC 30 - PR25). We estimated means and standard deviation of items and scales for each group at each time point. We analyzed items and scales scores with general linear model with repeated measures to evaluate changes between patients with or without TR to a normal level. p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons with Benjamini-Hochberg's false discovery rate procedure (p
results494 patients retained for analysis (median follow-up 16.2 years). A significantly higher number of patients (177/314 vs 79/180, p = 0.008) recovered a normal testosterone level in a significantly shorter time [median (IQR): 3.06 (2.55-3.65) vs 5.00 years (4.5-5.96), p < 0.001] in the 18- vs the 36-month cohort. Patients with TR had a significantly better QoL: 37/55 items and 14/21 scales (p
conclusionsTR is associated with significant regaining in QoL. A faster and significantly higher TR is seen in the shorter ADT schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.