Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565555›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data.

Andrew M Garratt, Knut Stavem, James W Shaw, Kim Rand

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07301489 (Akershus Cardiac Examination), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07301489 narecruitingnot on this map

Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 5 Study: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Lung Cancer Screening Plus Program to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Profile and Health in Individuals With Heavy Smoking History

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2025 to 2041Enrolled1,000ConditionsHeavy Smokers, Lung Cancer Screening, Cardiovascular Risk Profile, Cardiovascular Disease PreventionArmsLung Cancer Screening Plus Program, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 scores to EQ-5D-5L utility values for gynecological cancer survivors in follow-up care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Explaining inequalities in quality of life: a longitudinal study of health disparities in Norway.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew M GarrattDivision for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. andrew.garratt@fhi.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-4780
Knut StavemHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-8000
James W ShawBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-3211
Kim RandHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-4099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Norwegian adult population.

methodsRandom and quota sampling were used to recruit the sample of adults (age> 18 years) representative of the Norwegian general population. Data collection followed EQ-VT 2.1 undertaken before and after the COVID-19 pandemic from November 2019 to December 2022, using PC-assisted and video conferencing interviews, respectively. Each respondent valued 10 health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and 7 health states using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Different statistical models were assessed for logical consistency and predictive accuracy using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models.

resultsOf the 1,321 respondents, 1,237 met inclusion criteria. All statistical models demonstrated logical consistency. The weighted hybrid model combining both cTTOand DCE data was preferred and had the highest predictive accuracy. Predicted values ranged from -0.453 to 1, and the dimension of anxiety/depression was the most highly valued by respondents, followed by pain/discomfort, self-care, mobility, and usual activities. These findings are not dissimilar to those for most Western European countries, and regression coefficients are closest to those for other Scandinavian countries.

conclusionThis study provides the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on health state values obtained from members of the adult general population in Norway. This is an important contribution to economic evaluation and the broader application ofthe EQ-5D-5L in Norway including clinical and health services research, and quality measurement.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health StatusQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNorwaySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEQ-5D-5LGeneral populationOutcomesQuality of lifeUtilitiesValue set

Identifiers

PMID39565555
PMCPMC11865167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.