ArticleFamilial cancer2024
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing in unselected patients: example of private supplementation of public healthcare service.
Article in Familial cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the Emilia-Romagna region (Northern Italy), the identification and management of women at familial/hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer is guided by a well-established regional protocol. Here we report the results of the experience of private supplementation of public healthcare service in offering the possibility to undergo BRCA1/2 testing and/or multigene panel testing (MGPT) within a well-defined pathway to women unfulfilling regional criteria. Out of 177 patients referred to our center who underwent BRCA1/2 testing, 175 tested negative while two (1.1%) resulted carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA2; 69 patients also underwent MGPT, and in four cases (5.8%) a pathogenic variant were found (two in ATM and one in CHEK2 and RAD51C, respectively). Overall, this private supplementation of territorial public healthcare system has made it possible to confirm the validity of regional criteria for genetic testing access (concordance: 98.9%), but also to identify carriers of pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 that would have escaped regional protocol, to support the effectiveness of MGPT for the identification of rare cases (not BRCA) at mild/high risk, and to provide reassurance to women who were found to be non-carriers of pathogenic variants, who may benefit from a more accurate assessment of their risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.