ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Differences in the epidemiology and survival of patients with colorectal cancer between China and the United States: a large cross-sectional study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The status and determinants of demoralization in patients with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study in China.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Albumin-bilirubin score: a promising predictor of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the epidemiological and management characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) between China and the US has important implications. The present cross-sectional study included patients from SEER and Southwest China Colorectal (SCC) databases. Incidence, treatment and survival information were compared between two countries. 86859 patients in the SEER database and 5838 patients in the SCC database were included. The estimated incidence of CRC in the US was greater than that in China from 2006 to 2019. The most common tumor sites of CRC patients in China were the RSC (66.5%), RCC (20.2%) and LCC (13.3%), while those in the US were the RCC (44.4%), RSC (29.8%) and LCC (25.8%). Chinese CRC patients were more likely to be male (58.9% vs 52.4%, p < 0.001), have a greater stage II CRC rate (49.8% vs 27.8%, p < 0.001), younger age at diagnosis (median 64 vs 66 years, p < 0.001). Radical surgery rates were lower in Chinese RCC (92.3% vs 93.9%, p < 0.001) and LCC (88.9% vs 92.0%, p < 0.001) patients. The adjuvant therapy rates were lower in Chinese CRC patients. The 5-year overall survival rates were 71.8% and 78.2% for Chinese and US CRC patients, respectively (p < 0.001). China is undergoing an increasing incidence of CRC. The treatment and mortality of CRC differ in China and US populations. China had a lower adjuvant therapy rate and a lower 5-year OS rate compared with the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.