Trial reportCurrent medical science2024
Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Pringle Hepatic Hilar Occlusion in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Trial report in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Pringle hepatic hilar occlusion with a bulldog clamp in laparoscopic liver resection.
methodsFrom March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021, 80 patients were enrolled, including 40 undergoing intraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (IPM) and 40 extraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (EPM). The observation indices included basic preoperative clinical characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative liver function indices.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the basic characteristics or types of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, or hepatectomy time between the IPM and EPM groups. However, the blocking and operation time in the IPM group was shorter than that in the EPM group. There were no significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on the first day after surgery or in total bilirubin (TBIL) or albumin (ALB) levels on the first, third, or fifth days after surgery. However, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the first and third days, ALT and AST levels on the third and fifth days were lower, and hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the IPM group than in the EPM group.
conclusionIPM using bulldog clamps is simple, safe, and effective. The inflammatory reaction is less severe, the degree of liver function injury is lower, and recovery is faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.