ArticleTropical animal health and production2024
Practices and efficacy of nematode control in sheep, goats and cattle in communal grazing settings of central Ethiopia.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anthelmintic resistance in livestock in Africa: review of the current status.BMC veterinary research · 2025Pooled it
- Anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes on communally reared sheep farms of the King Sabata Dalindyebo Municipality, South Africa.Parasitology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communal grazing is the predominant farming system in Ethiopia and the livelihood of millions of people depend on it. Gastrointestinal nematodes represent a serious threat to the sustainability of these systems, and there is further concern due to the worldwide spread of anthelmintic resistance (AR). This study aimed to assess nematode control practices and anthelmintic efficacy in three districts of central Ethiopia, where sheep, goats and cattle are reared together by resource-poor farmers. A total of 153 farmers were interviewed and 36 faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) were conducted for each ruminant species grazing in the communal pastures, comprising a control group and three treatment groups (albendazole ABZ, tetramisole TET and ivermectin IVM) for each district. The questionnaire survey indicated that nematode control relies on poor practices and is substantially based on pharmacological treatments. About 91.8% of animals are treated at least twice a year often in absence of clinical signs and by untrained farmers, with no monitoring nor drug rotation implemented. In the FECRT-based survey, susceptibility to TET was confirmed in all trials, while treatment failure was a consistent finding for ABZ. IVM showed inefficacy in cattle and, to a lesser extent, in goats, while it was always effective in sheep. Research on AR in African countries is focused on small ruminants but in this study cattle had the worst results in terms of the number and severity of ineffective treatments, suggesting their inclusion in future studies on AR in this type of settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.