ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Is there a critical rate of torque development?
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An integrated model of rapid torque production: neuromuscular adaptations under fatigue after strength training.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that neuromuscular fatigue influences the rate of torque development (RTD) in a similar manner to isometric torque. Nine men participated in this study and performed 5-min all-out isometric tests for knee extensors (KE) and plantar flexors (PF) muscles, to determine the end-test torque (ET) and the critical rate of torque development (critical RTD). Additionally, participants performed submaximal constant-torque tests to task failure for KE and PF muscles. Both maximal voluntary contraction and RTD exhibited hyperbolic behavior and reached an asymptote at the end of the 5-min all out isometric test with similar relative values (KE 29.5 ± 5.6% MVC and PF 50.9 ± 2.9% MVC and KE 25.1 ± 3.6 to 28.5 ± 4.4% RTD and PF 48.4 ± 6.5 to 52.4 ± 5.8% RTD). However, both % MVC and % RTD were statistically different between muscle groups (P < 0.05), even when normalized by muscle volume (P < 0.05). Torque and RTD after the constant-torque test were similar to the values of ET and critical RTD (P > 0.05), respectively. In this study, it was observed that neuromuscular fatigue affects RTD and torque similarly, with the magnitude of this effect varying according to the muscle size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39565374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.