Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565314›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Calcineurin-fusion facilitates cryo-EM structure determination of a Family A GPCR.

Jun Xu, Geng Chen, Haoqing Wang, Sheng Cao, Jie Heng, Xavier Deupi, Yang Du, Brian K Kobilka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novel fusion tool to enable G protein-coupled receptor structure determination.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structure of a lasso peptide bound ETNature communications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The structure, function, and pharmacology of MRGPRs.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun Xu *Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Geng Chen *Kobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China.
Haoqing WangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Sheng CaoKobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China.
Jie HengBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Xavier DeupiCondensed Matter Theory Group, Division of Scientific Computing, Theory, and Data, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.
Yang DuKobilka Institute of Innovative Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8107-6397
Brian K KobilkaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-3990

Funding

THE MECHANISM OF BETA2 ADRENOCEPTOR ACTIVATIONR01NS028471 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOBILKA, BRIAN K · 1990 to 2021
$6.7M
G protein coupled receptor structure, dynamics, and signaling.R35NS137408 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Brian K Kobilka · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
National Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS) NS137408NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS028471NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS137408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in singe-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have made it possible to solve the structures of numerous Family A and Family B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in complex with G proteins and arrestins, as well as several Family C GPCRs. Determination of these structures has been facilitated by the presence of large extramembrane components (such as G protein, arrestin, or Venus flytrap domains) in these complexes that aid in particle alignment during the processing of the cryo-EM data. In contrast, determination of the inactive state structure of Family A GPCRs is more challenging due to the relatively small size of the seven transmembrane domain (7TM) and to the surrounding detergent micelle that, in the absence of other features, make particle alignment impossible. Here, we describe an alternative protein engineering strategy where the heterodimeric protein calcineurin is fused to a GPCR by three points of attachment, the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM6, and TM7. This three-point attachment provides a more rigid link with the GPCR transmembrane domain that facilitates particle alignment during data processing, allowing us to determine the structures of the β

Indexed as

CalcineurinCryoelectron MicroscopyReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2HEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein DomainsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRecombinant Fusion ProteinsADRB2 protein, humanCalcineurinReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledRecombinant Fusion Proteinscryo-electron microscopyGPCRinactive statestructure

Identifiers

PMID39565314
PMCPMC11621825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.