Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39565282›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2024

Applied deaf aesthetics toward transforming deaf higher education.

Joanne Weber, Denyse Hayward, Michael Skyer, Sarah Snively

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanne WeberFaculty of Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2G5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6031-2802
Denyse HaywardFaculty of Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2G5, Canada.
Michael SkyerCollege of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8057-7146
Sarah SnivelyFaculty of Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2G5, Canada.

Funding

Government of Canada to the Faculty of Education, University of Alberta
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deaf aesthetics is a theoretical framework we actualized to enhance interactions in deaf education, particularly via multimodal pedagogy and curricular experiences. Prior research illustrates that deaf aesthetics are desired by deaf teachers and students who are deaf; however, most instructional-delivery formats lack these supports. The present mixed-methodology, multi-method case study is an empirical evaluation of how deaf aesthetics contributed to the process of redesigning a course, including major revisions to instructional slide decks (e.g., PowerPoint, Google Slides, Prezi). The research question we examined is: How can instructional designers and university educators effectively design and use deaf aesthetics and multimodal curricula and pedagogies to prompt and sustain educational interactions with deaf or deafblind learners and teachers?

Indexed as

EstheticsCurriculumDeafnessEducation of Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesHumansPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesUniversitiesaccessdeafdeafblindInstructional Technology

Identifiers

PMID39565282
PMCPMC11661824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.