ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2024
Machine Learning-Based Detection of Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study in A Population of Iranian Female Patients.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of endometriosis using ultrasound images: a systematic review.Reproductive health · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable machine learning for endometriosis classification: a rule-based approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in endometriosis imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Prospects for potential therapy targeting immune‑associated factors in endometriosis (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis, is a prevalent condition among women of childbearing age, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands. It is associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of endometriosis is often delayed in many patients. While laparoscopic investigation is required for a definitive diagnosis, physical examination combined with ultrasonography can provide reasonably accurate detection. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise tools in medical imaging and diagnostics. However, there is a lack of sufficient ML studies focusing on Iranian endometriosis female patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms for endometriosis detection. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms in classifying suspicious cases of endometriosis using ultrasonographic signs. Our data set consisted of 505 patients, among which 149 were confirmed cases of endometriosis. We divided the data set into training and test sets to train and evaluate the performance of the ML models. To ensure robust evaluation, we employed stratified 5-fold cross-validation and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of model performance.
resultsIn the test set, a total of 37 out of 127 patients (29.1%) were diagnosed with endometriosis, while in the training set, 112 out of 378 patients (29.6%) were confirmed to have the condition. Sensitivities ranged from 59.5 to 75.7%, and specificities ranged from 71.7 to 83.3%. Notably, the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models exhibited the highest performance, with AUCs of 0.76.
conclusionOur study supports the use of ML models for the screening and diagnosis of endometriosis. The superior performance of the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models, as indicated by their high AUCs, suggests their potential as valuable tools in improving the accuracy of endometriosis detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.