SynthesisInternational journal of fertility & sterility2024
Efficacy of L-Arginine for Preventing Preeclampsia and Improving Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in the developmental programming of cardiovascular and renal risk across the lifespan.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Interventions for Preeclampsia: Integrating Placental and Maternal Perspectives.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026Review
- Nutritional supplements for preventing preeclampsia: A network meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- A to Z of Health: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Multivitamin-Multimineral and Nutraceutical Supplementation.Cureus · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in reducing the risk of preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: an integrative literature review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) remains a significant cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk pregnancies. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of L-arginine supplementation in preventing PE and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies. We searched international databases (ISI, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and extracted studies that evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine for preventing PE and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies. The data collected were analysed utilising the random-effects model in Stata (version 15). Out of the collected studies, 10 met the eligibility criteria, comprising a total sample size of 1165 subjects (586 cases and 584 controls). The mean age of the cases was 28 ± 5.05 years, while that of the controls was 27.32 ± 4.58 years. The results revealed that L-arginine was more effective in reducing the incidence of PE than placebo [odds ratio (OR)=0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17, 0.77]. Also, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in systolic blood pressure (SBP; standard mean difference (SMD): -0.35, 95% CI: -91, 21) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; SMD: -0.50, 95% CI: -1.08, 0.07). There was a statistically significant difference in neonatal birth weight between the two groups (SMD: -0.16, 95% CI: -31, -0.01). No statistically significant difference existed between the two groups in terms of gestational age (SMD: 0.6, 95% CI: -0.06, 0.18). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the APGAR score at one minute (SMD: 0.40, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.82). Our findings revealed that L-arginine supplementation during pregnancy reduced the incidence of PE in high-risk pregnancies. However, it does not significantly improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.