Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564822›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of fertility & sterility2024

Efficacy of L-Arginine for Preventing Preeclampsia and Improving Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fatemeh Naderipour, Fariba Keshavarzi, Hosna Mirfakhraee, Parisa Dini, Niousha Jamshidnezhad, Nastaran Abolghasem, Foroogh Sabzghabaei, Fatemeh Shariatinia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Therapeutic Interventions for Preeclampsia: Integrating Placental and Maternal Perspectives.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fatemeh NaderipourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fariba KeshavarziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hosna MirfakhraeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa DiniDepartment of Nephrology, Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niousha JamshidnezhadDepartment of Nephrology, Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nastaran AbolghasemDepartment of Nephrology, Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Foroogh SabzghabaeiDepartment of Nephrology, Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ShariatiniaMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Email: Hafez_perina@sums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) remains a significant cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk pregnancies. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of L-arginine supplementation in preventing PE and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies. We searched international databases (ISI, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and extracted studies that evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine for preventing PE and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies. The data collected were analysed utilising the random-effects model in Stata (version 15). Out of the collected studies, 10 met the eligibility criteria, comprising a total sample size of 1165 subjects (586 cases and 584 controls). The mean age of the cases was 28 ± 5.05 years, while that of the controls was 27.32 ± 4.58 years. The results revealed that L-arginine was more effective in reducing the incidence of PE than placebo [odds ratio (OR)=0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17, 0.77]. Also, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in systolic blood pressure (SBP; standard mean difference (SMD): -0.35, 95% CI: -91, 21) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; SMD: -0.50, 95% CI: -1.08, 0.07). There was a statistically significant difference in neonatal birth weight between the two groups (SMD: -0.16, 95% CI: -31, -0.01). No statistically significant difference existed between the two groups in terms of gestational age (SMD: 0.6, 95% CI: -0.06, 0.18). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the APGAR score at one minute (SMD: 0.40, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.82). Our findings revealed that L-arginine supplementation during pregnancy reduced the incidence of PE in high-risk pregnancies. However, it does not significantly improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

High-Risk PregnanciesL-ArginineNutritional SupplementsPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID39564822
PMCPMC11589976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.