ArticleJournal of microscopy2025
Quantifying whole human hair scalp fibres of varying curl: A micro-computed tomographic study.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying whole human hair scalp fibres of varying curl: A micro-computed tomographic study.Journal of microscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scalp hair is a key feature of humans and its variability has been the subject of a broad range of studies. A small subset of these studies has focused on geometric quantification of human scalp hair fibres, however the use of race- and ethnicity-based classification systems makes it challenging to draw objective conclusions about fibre variability. Furthermore, sample preparation techniques for micro-imaging studies often alter the original form of hair fibres. This study sought to determine which of the commonly reported descriptors could be resolved using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for fibres of varying curl. Images obtained from micro-CT were used to reconstruct three-dimensional images that were then analysed. The study also explored the capabilities and limitations of micro-CT as an imaging modality by comparing and cross-validating findings with those obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser micrometry. The former deals with surface imaging while the latter deals with cross-sectional measurements. Micro-CT was found to be highly effective at resolving cross-sectional ellipsoidal parameters, but performed more poorly than SEM in reconstructing surface level details at a 2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.