Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564683›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025

Different impacts of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes for adult acute myeloid leukemia according to graft type.

Takaaki Konuma, Kazuaki Kameda, Kaoru Morita, Tadakazu Kondo, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Fumihiko Ouchi, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Takaaki KonumaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1953-8463
Kazuaki KamedaDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kaoru MoritaDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-8189
Tadakazu KondoDepartment of Hematology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8959-6271
Fumihiko KimuraDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-9904
Hideki NakasoneDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-9315
Fumihiko OuchiHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoyuki UchidaDepartment of Hematology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-5926
Masatsugu TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Tetsuya NishidaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro FukudaDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta HasegawaDepartment of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Mamiko Sakata-YanagimotoDepartment of Hematology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Makoto OnizukaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Masashi SawaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan.
Shuichi OtaDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-244X
Noboru AsadaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-5460
Shin-Ichiro FujiwaraDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Satoshi YoshiharaDepartment of Hematology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Fumihiko IshimaruTechnical Department, Japanese Red Cross Society Blood Service Headquarters, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto YoshimitsuDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5935-0385
Yoshinobu KandaDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-9307
Marie OhbikiJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan.
Yoshiko AtsutaJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan.
Masamitsu YanadaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-9775

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED 18ek0510023h0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5-10), early initiation (Days 0-4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdolescentAdultAgedBone Marrow TransplantationCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, HomologousGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID39564683
PMCPMC11625993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.