ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2024
Lung stereotactic radiation therapy: Early results from the Salah Azaiez Institute.
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has transformed lung cancer care, delivering precise treatment with minimal harm to healthy tissue.
aimThis study examined the experience at the Salah Azaiez Institute (SAI) in lung cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: we conducted a retrospective study on patients treated with SBRT from 2019 to 2022. Planification imaging included four-dimensional CT scans and delineation of target volumes and organs-at-risk was done as per international guidelines. Treatment doses were tailored based on tumour location.
resultsA total of 10 cases were included. The male-to-female sex ratio was 4:1, with a median age of 69.5 years. Three had unconfirmed primary lung tumours, while five had inoperable stage I-IIA adenocarcinomas primarily due to compromised respiratory function. Two had oligometastatic lung diseases. All underwent recent thoracic-CT and PET-CT evaluations to exclude pulmonary fibrosis. The median lesion size was 40mm. Karnofsky's performance status ranged from 70 to 90, with no contraindications to the supine position. Eight out of 10 patients received 8 fractions of 7.5 Gy at the 80% isodose. For that regimen, the D95%, D99%, and Dmax were respectively, 60 Gy, 56 Gy, 73 Gy. All organs-at-risk dosimetric criteria were met. Acute toxicities included worsened coughs in 2 patients and fatigue in 6. After a mean follow-up of 23 months, no rib fractures or haemoptysis were observed, and no local recurrence was reported on the last chest CT scan.
conclusionSBRT demonstrates promise for lung cancer treatment, though challenges persist in precise targeting and motion management. Effective multidisciplinary collaboration and local protocols are crucial for successful implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.