Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564612›Full record

ArticlePsyCh journal2025

Unraveling the Intricacies of Curiosity: A Comprehensive Study of Its Measures in the Chinese Context.

Yan Tian, Qi Huang, Xianqing Liu, Jiamin Zhang, Yanghua Ye, Haiyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan TianCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0994-4349
Qi HuangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-5568
Xianqing LiuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4999-2525
Jiamin ZhangCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5562-1589
Yanghua YeCenter for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3939-7674
Haiyan WuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-6636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curiosity, as the strong desire to acquire new information, plays a crucial role in human behaviors. While recent research has delved into the effects, behavioral manifestations, and neural underpinnings of curiosity, the absence of standardized assessment tools for measuring curiosity may hinder advancements in this field. Here, we translated different curiosity scales into Chinese and tested each translated scale by examining its reliability and structural validity. Our results showed that the scores derived from these scales have comparable reliability to those original versions. The confirmatory factor analysis results of the curiosity scales were consistent with previous results. We also found significant associations between different types of curiosity within taxonomy and demonstrated that personality traits such as impulsive sensation seeking, intolerance of uncertainty, and openness can jointly predict trait curiosity. Additionally, we confirmed the social dimension of curiosity, showing that loneliness partially mediates the relationship between social anxiety and social curiosity. This study provides validated Chinese versions of curiosity scales and elucidates the mechanisms of curiosity from multiple perspectives, potentially advancing curiosity research in the Chinese and cross-cultural contexts.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorPersonalityPsychometricsAdolescentAdultChinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChinese‐version curiosity scalesconfirmatory factor analysiscuriosity assessmentscale reliabilitysocial curiosity

Identifiers

PMID39564612
PMCPMC11961245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.