Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564609›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025

Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps.

Quinn Bongers, Alejandro P Comellas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Quinn BongersUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Alejandro P Comellas

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is thought of as a disease caused by tobacco exposure, but numerous occupational exposures have been identified as risk factors for development of disease and exacerbations, although these remain underappreciated and underdiagnosed. We highlight evidence of occupational exposures and how they relate to COPD, while also looking at gaps in how the changing workplace might affect the occupational COPD landscape. RECENT

findingsHistorical exposures linked to COPD included inorganic dusts like coal and silica and organic dusts like cotton and wood. Other data associated agricultural exposures, cleaning agents, air pollution, and construction work with COPD. As the workplace has evolved to include more work from home and growing industries like ridesharing and delivery, items like radon and indoor and outdoor air quality must be factored into the equation as occupational exposures with the potential to cause COPD and increase its morbidity. Despite this, causal conclusions with many risk factors are challenging due to the complex interaction between patient susceptibilities and environmental factors, both occupation-related and nonoccupation related. SUMMARY: Additional studies are needed, not only to better evaluate occupational exposures and COPD pathogenesis, but also to look at more solution-oriented areas like precision medicine and interventions targeting a healthier workplace.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDustHumansRisk FactorsDust

Identifiers

PMID39564609
PMCPMC12529574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.