ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Exploring and Validating the Mechanism of Ulinastatin in the Treatment of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Based on Transcriptome Sequencing.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ulinastatin Treatment Associated with Lower Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Risk in Sepsis Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Observational
- Identification and Analysis of Remimazolam's Potential Therapeutic Mechanisms in Murine Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy via Transcriptomic Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Trajectory of serum osmolality changes and 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis-associated delirium based on the MIMIC-IV database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sepsis can induce sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), with Ulinastatin (UTI) serving a critical anti-inflammatory role. This study aimed to identify the hub genes in an SAE mouse model following UTI intervention and investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms. Materials and Methods: Through differential expression analysis to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs), ie, UTI vs CLP (DEGs1) and Con vs CLP (DEGs2). After taking the intersection of the genes with opposite differential trends in these two parts and immune-related genes (IRGs), DE-IRGs were obtained. Hub genes in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network were then determined using six algorithms from the Cytohubba plugin in Cytoscape. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was employed to explore the functional relevance of these hub genes. Additionally, the immune microenvironment across the three groups was compared, and hub gene-related drugs were predicted using an online database. Finally, qRT-PCR was used to validate the expression of the hub genes in hippocampal tissue from CLP mice. Results: RNA sequencing obtained 864 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (CLP vs Con) and 279 DEGs (UTI vs CLP). Taking the intersection of DEGs with opposite expression trends yielded 165 DEGs. Six key genes (ICAM - 1, IRF7, IL - 1β, CCL2, IL - 6 and SOCS3) were screened by six algorithms. Immune infiltration analysis found that Treg cells were reversed after treatment with UTI in the diseased state. A total of 106 hub - gene - related drugs were predicted, among which BINDARIT - CCL2 and LIFITEGRAST - ICAM1 showed particularly high affinities. The qRT - PCR verification results were consistent with the sequencing results. Conclusion: In conclusion,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.