Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564422›Full record

ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2025

The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Score May Not be Useful in Predicting Complications and Unplanned Readmission After 1-Level or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

Gaston Camino-Willhuber, Soji Tani, Lukas Schonnagel, Thomas Caffard, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Bruno Verna, Artine Arzani, Jiaqi Zhu, Jennifer Shue and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gaston Camino-WillhuberOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Soji TaniOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Lukas SchonnagelOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Thomas CaffardOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Erika ChiapparelliOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Krizia AmorosoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9703-262X
Bruno VernaOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2823-6724
Artine ArzaniOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Jiaqi ZhuBiostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Jennifer ShueOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
William D ZelentyOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Gbolabo SokunbiOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Darren R LeblOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Frank P CammisaOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Federico P GirardiOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.
Alexander P HughesOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-9672
Andrew A SamaOrthopaedic Surgery, Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been shown to be a reliable risk stratification tool in different spine procedures. Its usefulness to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) has not been studied extensively. Purpose: We aimed to assess the usefulness of the mFI-5 in 1-level or 2-level ACDF surgery by asking the following questions: (1) Is the mFI-5 a reliable tool to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (2) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting prolonged hospital stay after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (3) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting readmission after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF at our institution. The mFI-5 was calculated based on the presence of 5 comorbidities: (1) congestive heart failure, (2) diabetes mellitus, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (4) partially or totally dependent functional status, and (5) hypertension requiring medication. Patients were classified in 3 groups: not frail (mFI-5 items = 0), pre-frail (mFI-5 items = 1), and frail (mFI-5 items ≥2). Postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission were recorded. Results: In the 662 patients included (mean age 51.4 ± 10.4 years), surgical and medical complications were not significantly different among groups. Lengths of stay and readmission rates were both significantly higher in the pre-frail group. Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that the mFI-5 might not be reliable to assess preoperative risk after 1-level or 2-level ACDF.

Indexed as

cervical spinecomplicationsfrailty indexreadmission

Identifiers

PMID39564422
PMCPMC11572452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.