Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564395›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score Into Japanese and Comparison of Visual Analog Scale and 10-Point Scale Formats.

Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hirotake Yokota, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Noriko Akiho-Toyoda, Keisuke Ushiro, Yuki Ebihara, Shigeharu Tanaka, Tadashi Wada, Hirofumi Jigami, Hisashi Matsumoto and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tomonobu IshigakiAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute of Life Innovation Research Center, Toyo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-218X
Hirotake YokotaAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroshi AkuzawaAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Noriko Akiho-ToyodaStudent Support Organization, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Keisuke UshiroFaculty of Physical Education, Department of Sports and Physical Education, Kokushikan University, Tama, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki EbiharaFaculty of Physical Education, Department of Sports and Physical Education, Kokushikan University, Tama, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeharu TanakaFaculty of Physical Education, Department of Sports and Physical Education, Kokushikan University, Tama, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadashi WadaSchool of Science and Engineering, Human Informatics Course, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi JigamiSchool of Science and Engineering, Human Informatics Course, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi MatsumotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Hokushin Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yu ItoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Hokushin Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Takanori KikumotoAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Yuiko MatsuuraAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-1140
Ryo HirabayashiAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9276
Chie SekineAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Noriaki YamamotoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata Rehabilitation Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Go OmoriAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Mutsuaki EdamaAthlete Support Research Center, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-6466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC) is sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in the functional level of the shoulder or elbow in overhead athletes. However, a Japanese version of the KJOC is not yet available. Moreover, the original KJOC uses a visual analog scale (VAS) assessment format that requires a print version so that users can add a check mark along a horizontal line. The KJOC can be completed using online tools such as Google Forms if a 10-point scale format can be used with comparable results. Purposes: To (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the KJOC into Japanese (KJOC-J) and assess its validity and (2) evaluate the correlation between a standard VAS format and a 10-point scale format (KJOC-J10). Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In total, 318 athletes participated in the validation study, 255 in the test-retest reliability study for the KJOC-J, and 273 in the validation study for the KJOC-J10. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha. Validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KJOC-J10 was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J10 and KJOC-J. Results: The Cronbach alpha was 0.914, indicating good internal consistency. The KJOC-J was moderately correlated with the DASH ( Conclusion: The study results demonstrated good internal consistency, validity, and reliability for the KJOC-J, indicating that it is a valid assessment tool for shoulder and elbow functions in Japanese overhead athletes. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between the VAS and 10-point formats of the KJOC-J.

Indexed as

Japanquestionnaireself-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39564395
PMCPMC11574881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.