ArticleHealth science reports2024
Optimizing Multiparametric MRI Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Assessment Aligned with PI-RADS Guidelines.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of preoperative multiparametric MRI with oncological and functional outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multicentre prospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Lesion Stiffness Measured by Magnetic Resonance Elastography: A Novel Biomarker for Differentiating Benign, Premalignant and Malignant Prostate Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation of Anterior Obliterative Urethral Strictures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recognized as the most indicative method for diagnosing prostate cancer. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation aligned with the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, offering an in-depth insight into the various MRI sequences used in a standard mpMRI protocol. Additionally, it outlines the critical technical requirements necessary to perform a standard mpMRI examination of the prostate, as defined by the PI-RADS specifications. Methods: European Society of Urogenital Radiology has released PI-RADS guideline detailing its suggestions aimed at improving the standards of the procedure. The purpose of this guideline is to establish a standard strategy for MRI protocols and image interpretation, aiming to prevent variability in each of the imaging and interpretation stages. Results: A standard mpMRI protocol comprises morphological sequences and functional sequences. Morphological sequences which encompass T1- and T2-weighted images, and various functional sequences include diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The PI-RADS recommendations assert that having a standard and uniform protocol for all MRI centers is imperative. Furthermore, the existence of a standardized checklist for interpreting MRI images can foster greater consensus in the process of diagnosing and treating patients. Conclusion: Standardized protocols and checklists for mpMRI interpretation are essential for achieving greater consensus among radiologists, ultimately leading to improved diagnostic outcomes in prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.