Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564213›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2024

Hindi Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M): A Cross-Sectional Study from the Metabolic Surgery Clinic in North India.

Kumari Rina, Rosali Bhoi, Anubhav Vindal, Pawanindra Lal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kumari RinaGovind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Maulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2592-9620
Rosali BhoiGovind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Maulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India.
Anubhav VindalMaulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi) & Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Pawanindra LalMaulana Azad Medical College (University of Delhi) & Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-2537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The lack of culturally-sensitive tool masks the epidemiology of weight-bias and internalized-stigma. This study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Modified Weight-Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M) into Hindi. Methods: The translation and adaptation process followed the World Health Organization guidelines. Three psychiatrists translated the original WBIS-M into Hindi. The bilingual panel comprised four psychiatrists, two laparoscopic bariatric surgeons, a professor of English, and an individual with severe obesity (with an International English Language Testing System (IELTS) score of Band 8.5) who was familiar with Western culture. The panel identified and resolved inadequate expressions of translations or discrepancies. An independent translator, whose mother tongue was English, back-translated it into the English language. Focused group discussions with individuals with severe obesity were conducted. The final H-WBIS-M was administered to undergraduates ( Results: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.788, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was χ Conclusions: The H-WBIS-M demonstrated good psychometric properties based on standard testing procedures.

Indexed as

epidemiologyscale developmentWeight-bias internalizationweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID39564213
PMCPMC11572379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.