ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Understanding Typology of Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Persistence Trajectories Among Male PrEP Users in the United States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beliefs About Toxic Interactions Between Alcohol and PrEP Predict Less Initiation and More Discontinuation: Results from the RADAR Cohort Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- PrEParing for Long-acting Technologies: A Multistate Analysis of PrEP Persistence and HIV and STI Lab Coverage Among Oral PrEP Initiators in St. Louis, Missouri (2014-2021).Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding longitudinal patterns of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men could offer insights for developing efficient and timely interventions to promote PrEP persistence. Setting: We extracted 2 years of pharmacy fill records for 4000 males who initiated PrEP in 2017 at a national chain pharmacy in the United States. Methods: Group-based trajectory models were used to develop PrEP trajectory clusters, with periods of use defined based on optimal PrEP seroprotection probabilities (ie, PrEP use frequency ≥4 doses/week). Multinomial logistic regressions were used to evaluate the associations between sociodemographic covariates and identified trajectory group membership. Results: We identified 4 distinct groups of PrEP persistence trajectories: (1) persistent use of PrEP throughout the period (persistent user), (2) brief use followed by sustained cessation of PrEP use (brief user), (3) PrEP use up to the mid-term followed by sustained cessation of PrEP use (mid-term user), and (4) PrEP use, followed by cessation and subsequent reinitiation (PrEP reinitiator). Persistent users and brief users accounted for 40.1% and 22.9% of the population, respectively, whereas mid-term users and reinitiators accounted for 18.9% and 18.2%, respectively. Older age at PrEP initiation, commercial insurance as the primary payer of PrEP, and use of specialty pharmacy were found to be associated with persistent PrEP use over the other patterns of nonpersistence. Conclusions: Subgroups of PrEP users could benefit from PrEP persistence interventions that target specific timings of likely PrEP cessation or considerations of reinitiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.