ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024
Developing a Conceptual Framework for a Person-Centered Approach to Improving Adherence and Outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening: The Engaged Approach to Lung Cancer Screening: A Brief Report.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Describing behavioral aspects of annual lung cancer screening participation: Application of the cognitive-social health information processing model.Preventive oncology & epidemiology · 2026Article
- A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Translating outcomes from randomized trials of lung cancer screening into community practice settings has been challenging. We developed a framework-the Engaged Approach to Lung Cancer Screening (EA-LCS)-for improving adherence and individual and population health outcomes in LCS. Methods: Employing community-engaged research, we conducted semistructured interviews with LCS program staff (N = 15) and participants (N = 7) and administered brief surveys to understand LCS adherence. We combined our knowledge of LCS implementation with data to formulate the EA-LCS framework Results: Program staff identified four factors that facilitated adherence: (1) the use of specialized tracking software, (2) the importance of personal connection and a reliable touchpoint, (3) centralized program operations, and (4) standardization and streamlining of reports to participants and clinicians. Participant data identified four factors supporting adherence: (1) a single contact point and information availability, (2) tailored communications, (3) personalized results delivery, and (4) increased scan accessibility. Combined analyses identified three overarching themes in the EA-LCS framework: (1) respect, (2) trust, and (3) engagement. Conclusions: The EA-LCS conceptual model integrates three foundational principles (person-centeredness, trustworthy relationships, and sustained communications) to enhance LCS adherence. Efforts are underway to translate the EA-LCS framework into materials to support adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.