Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564095›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024

Intracranial Response to Selpercatinib After Pralsetinib-Induced Disease Progression in Rearranged During Transfection Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report.

Illaa Smesseim, Tijmen van der Wel, Sushil K Badrising

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Illaa SmesseimDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tijmen van der WelDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sushil K BadrisingDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration-approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib's potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.

Indexed as

Case ReportNon–small-cell lung carcinomaNSCLCRETRET fusionSelpercatinib

Identifiers

PMID39564095
PMCPMC11574800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.