ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024
Identifying Novel Germline Mutations and Copy Number Variations in Patients With SCLC.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Genetic and Molecular Analyses of Rare Candidate GermlineInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: SCLC has traditionally been considered to arise from toxic exposure factors, such as smoking. Recent evidence has revealed that germline mutations may also affect the development of SCLC; however, these alterations remain understudied. We sought to identify novel germline mutations in SCLC including germline copy number variations (CNVs) in our cohort of patients. Methods: We designed a custom hybrid-capture gene panel to evaluate germline alterations in 192 cancer-predisposition and frequently mutated genes in SCLC. We applied this panel to germline analysis of a treatment-naive cohort of 67 patients with SCLC at our institution. Subsequently, we annotated the variants using the American College of Medical Genetics criteria and further classified variants of uncertain significance using a set of in silico tools, including DeepMind AlphaMissense, MutationTaster, SIFT, and Polyphen2. Results: We identified American College of Medical Genetics pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations in seven of 67 patients. Five (71%) were novel alterations ( Conclusions: Our study identifies novel germline alterations, including a CNV, and provides additional evidence that germline factors could be important contributing factors to the development of SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.