ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Is limb overcorrection following total knee arthroplasty compromising functional outcome?
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Many patients remain unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Personalized alignment strategies have gained popularity in the search to improve patient satisfaction and function. This study aimed to examine the impact of limb overcorrection in the coronal plane on patient satisfaction and functional outcome. The secondary aim was to investigate how a change in knee phenotype following TKA affects clinical outcome. Methods: A retrospective matched case-control study was designed between patients with limb overcorrection (N = 37) and a control group (N = 104). Mean follow-up was 68 months. Satisfaction and function were compared by means of the new 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological evaluation was performed on weight-bearing full-leg radiographs. Overcorrection was defined as a mechanical HKA (mHKA) angle of 2° or more and opposite to the preoperative alignment. The control group consisted of TKAs that were corrected to neutral or left in slight undercorrection. Finally, component alignment (lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA)) and Coronal Plane Alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes were evaluated. Results: The overcorrection group performed better than the control group in terms of KSS subscores satisfaction and functional activities, total KSS score, all KOOS subcategories, and total KOOS score. Subdivision of the control group into a neutral and undercorrection group, and the overcorrection group into mild and severe overcorrection, revealed similar findings.A chance in knee phenotype as per aHKA, JLO or CPAK did not result in worse clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Accidental limb overcorrection after TKA does not result in inferior clinical outcomes or patient satisfaction at midterm follow-up.The present study could not identify an optimal coronal alignment target. This suggests that coronal alignment as a predictor of patient satisfaction and function is likely less important than previously believed. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.