ReviewCureus2024
Current Trends in the Management of Hiatal Hernia: A Literature Review of 10 Years of Data.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative FLIP to guide revisional hiatal hernia repair: early experience and outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Intraoperative endoscopy: A controversial tool or a necessity in modern esophagogastric surgery?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Clinical Volume and Perioperative Outcomes of Hiatal Hernia Repair Within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-General Thoracic Surgery Database.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
- When helpful becomes harmful: a case-based narrative review of esophageal mesh migration after hiatal hernia repair.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Review
- Review
- Accessory spleens, mixed hiatal hernia, and incisional hernias: a complex case of multidisciplinary surgical management.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hiatal hernia (HH) is commonly detected during endoscopic examinations and is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in diagnosing and treating HH. Surgical techniques for HH repair include open surgery, various laparoscopic procedures, transoral incisionless fundoplication, and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is often considered the standard for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease-related HH due to its effectiveness. Other procedures, such as Toupet and Dor fundoplications, may be suited for patients with specific conditions, such as impaired esophageal motility. Newer approaches, including the MSA system and mesh repair, focus on patient-specific treatments to achieve the best outcomes. This review synthesizes the literature from 2014 to 2024 to provide an overview of current trends in HH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.