ReviewCureus2024
Real-Time Perfusion and Leak Assessment in Bariatric Surgery: Bridging Traditional and Advanced Techniques.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic sleeve gastrectomyWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Article
- Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Current Status and Future Directions.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Weight Reduction with GLP-1 Agonists and Paths for Discontinuation While Maintaining Weight Loss.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive literature review explores the efficacy of real-time perfusion and leak assessment methods in bariatric surgery, comparing traditional techniques with advanced imaging modalities. As the global incidence of obesity and related comorbidities rises, the demand for bariatric surgeries such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy has increased, along with the risk of serious complications like anastomotic and staple line leaks. Traditional intraoperative leak testing methods, including the air leak and methylene blue dye tests, are commonly employed but exhibit inconsistent sensitivity in leak detection. Intraoperative endoscopy, although underutilized, offers enhanced visualization and has been associated with reduced leak and complication rates in certain cases. Emerging technologies such as indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) provide real-time assessment of tissue perfusion, potentially improving surgical outcomes. ICG fluorescence enables visualization of blood flow to detect ischemia, while LSCI offers immediate, dye-free perfusion mapping, and HSI assesses tissue oxygenation without the need for contrast agents. Despite their promise, these technologies are limited by high costs, technical complexity, and varying accessibility, with current evidence insufficient to confirm their superiority over traditional methods. Future research should focus on large-scale, multicenter trials to validate these advanced techniques and refine their application in clinical practice. Integrating traditional and emerging methods may optimize intraoperative decision-making, reduce complications rates, and enhance patient outcomes in bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.