Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564044›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Utility of Ultrasound in Evaluating an Ambiguously Working Thoracic Epidural: A Case Series.

Alexander Ip, Anthony Barisano, Vendhan Ramanujam

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander IpAnesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Anthony BarisanoAnesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Vendhan RamanujamAnesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A thoracic epidural is commonly used for analgesia following trauma or surgery. Traditionally, thoracic epidurals are performed using the loss of resistance technique. However, false-positive loss of resistance and catheter placement outside the epidural space is possible. In such scenarios and when clinical equivalents, such as hemodynamic changes and sensory loss to epidural blockade, fail as well, assessment of the catheter position can be accomplished using ultrasound. Ultrasound scanning can identify the catheter and spread of the injectate past the laminas to confirm its epidural positioning. In addition, multiple scanning approaches can be used to view the interlaminar spaces at the thoracic level, which are usually challenging to visualize compared to the lumbar level to verify the epidural catheter. It can be done at the bedside, in real-time, and with the feasibility of obtaining immediate results. This way, a nonfunctioning catheter can be replaced promptly to achieve adequate analgesia. We present a case series of patients in whom an ultrasound was utilized to evaluate and replace ambiguously working thoracic epidural catheters that were primarily placed by the loss of resistance technique.

Indexed as

acute pain servicesanesthesiologyregional anesthesiologythoracic epidural analgesiaultrasonography (us)ultrasound in anesthesiology

Identifiers

PMID39564044
PMCPMC11574916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.