ArticleCureus2024
Factors Associated With the Recruitment of Primary Care Workforce in Rural Vermont: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in pulmonary embolism mortality among older adults with lung cancer in the united States, 1999-2020.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study, conducted in collaboration with Windham Aging, aims to explore the key factors influencing the recruitment of primary care professionals (PCPs) in rural Vermont. It strives to contribute to the development of effective strategies to address the healthcare needs of rural communities, particularly focusing on the aging population. Methods The study employed a qualitative approach, involving structured interviews with Family Medicine residents and Doctor of Nurse Practitioner (DNP) students training at the University of Vermont Medical Center who were interested in pursuing primary care. The interview questions were developed after a roundtable discussion with rural Vermont PCPs. The data were analyzed using thematic, inductive methods. Results The study included 12 participants. Its findings challenge common assumptions about rural healthcare recruitment. While financial incentives are traditionally considered pivotal, this research revealed that personal and lifestyle factors play a more crucial role. Such factors include prior experiences in rural healthcare, preferences for rural living, and community attributes such as housing availability, educational facilities, and political landscape. These insights reveal a complex interplay of personal and community factors in the decision-making process. Conclusions To effectively recruit PCPs in rural areas of Vermont, strategies need to extend beyond financial incentives. Emphasizing rural exposure during medical education and fostering stronger ties with rural healthcare settings during clinical rotations are key. Understanding the varied motivations behind healthcare professionals' choices is crucial for developing successful recruitment strategies in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.