ArticleThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2024
Real-time Technical Support Using a Remote Technology During Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Follow-up: A Preliminary Multicenter Experience in Clinical Practice.
Article in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industry-employed allied professionals (IEAPs) provide technical assistance to physicians during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, programming, troubleshooting, and follow-up. The Heart Connect™ application (Boston Scientific Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) is a data-sharing system that enables remote access and display sharing of the CIED Programmer. This report aims to describe the preliminary experience of remote IEAP support through the application during CIED follow-up in clinical practice. The application was downloaded on the programmer, and network connections were established and tested at six Italian centers. Staff members were trained and online meetings were scheduled with IEAPs during consecutive CIED follow-up visits. Data and user feedback were collected. A total of 20 operators received training, and online meetings were conducted during 208 patient visits. Of these, 202 (97%) visits were successfully completed with remote support, without the need for additional medical or technical assistance. The connection quality, audio, and video were rated as good or excellent in ≥95% of sessions. The average duration of online meetings ranged from 6-16 min, depending on the supported session type. Comprehensive CIED checks and tests were performed during the visits, leading to the identification of relevant conditions or programming changes in 29% of visits. All operators found the application to be user-friendly and effective. Overall, satisfaction with the remote support service was rated high in 80% of responses, particularly for managing unscheduled CIED follow-up visits. In conclusion, remote support during CIED follow-up appears to be feasible, effective, and well accepted. It offers a viable alternative to traditional on-site IEAP support for both scheduled and unscheduled follow-up visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.