Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563989›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2024

Device Therapy in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Current Review, Challenges, and Future Prospects.

Mohamed ElRefai, Christina Menexi, Paul R Roberts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed ElRefaiCardiology Department, University Hospital of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christina MenexiCardiology Department, Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Essex, UK.
Paul R RobertsCardiology Department, University Hospital of Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a complex disease characterized by inflammatory granulomas that can affect various organs, including the heart. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis poses challenges, and current criteria involve the use of advanced imaging techniques and histological confirmation. Clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis vary widely, ranging from heart block to ventricular tachycardia and heart failure. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant concern, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for preventing SCD in high-risk cases. However, some patients with cardiac sarcoidosis do not meet the current guidelines for ICD implantation, leaving them at risk. Traditional transvenous ICDs are associated with complications, especially in immunosuppressed patients. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) offers a potential solution, as it avoids vascular complications and reduces the risk of infections. However, concerns regarding inappropriate shocks and the lack of pacing therapy limit its widespread use. Leadless pacing combined with S-ICD represents a potential novel approach to managing cardiac sarcoidosis patients. Ongoing human clinical trials are expected to shed light on the safety and efficacy of this combined therapy. Cardiac sarcoidosis patients, who have been underserved by traditional device therapies, may benefit from this personalized approach. Further research is needed to guide the management of SCD risk in this population.

Indexed as

Cardiac sarcoidosisleadless pacemakersubcutaneous ICDsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID39563989
PMCPMC11573303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.