ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024
Deep learning algorithm for predicting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning analysis of ECGs detects Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic syndrome burden in people with diabetes: a report from the Silesia Diabetes-Heart Project.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence-Derived Electrocardiogram Analysis for Identification of Carbon Monoxide-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Wearable devices and cardiovascular health: revolutionizing remote monitoring and disease prevention.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Electrocardiogram Screening for Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in the General Population.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Detection and prognostic stratification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using a fine-tuned ECG foundation model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transparent and Robust Artificial Intelligence-Driven Electrocardiogram Model for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Early Detection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients with Normal Sinus Rhythm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- AI-Enabled Smartwatch ECG: A Feasibility Study for Early Prediction and Prevention of Heart Failure Rehospitalization.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Although evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is crucial for deciding the rate control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), real-time assessment of LVEF is limited in outpatient settings. We aimed to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with AF and rapid ventricular response (RVR). Methods and results: This study is an external validation of a pre-existing deep learning algorithm based on residual neural network architecture. Data were obtained from a prospective cohort of AF with RVR at a single centre between 2018 and 2023. Primary outcome was the detection of LVSD, defined as a LVEF ≤ 40%, assessed using 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Secondary outcome involved predicting LVSD using 1-lead ECG (Lead I). Among 423 patients, 241 with available echocardiography data within 2 months were evaluated, of whom 54 (22.4%) were confirmed to have LVSD. Deep learning algorithm demonstrated fair performance in predicting LVSD [area under the curve (AUC) 0.78]. Negative predictive value for excluding LVSD was 0.88. Deep learning algorithm resulted competent performance in predicting LVSD compared with N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (AUC 0.78 vs. 0.70, Conclusion: Deep learning algorithm demonstrated competent performance in predicting LVSD in patients with AF and RVR. In outpatient setting, use of artificial intelligence-based algorithm may facilitate prediction of LVSD and earlier choice of drug, enabling better symptom control in AF patients with RVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.