Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563907›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Digital solutions to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy prescription rates in patients with heart failure: a clinical consensus statement from the ESC Working Group on e-Cardiology, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions of the European Society of Cardiology, the ESC Digital Health Committee, the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology, and the ESC Patient Forum.

Mark Johan Schuuring, Roderick Willem Treskes, Teresa Castiello, Magnus Thorsten Jensen, Ruben Casado-Arroyo, Lis Neubeck, Alexander R Lyon, Nurgul Keser, Marcin Rucinski, Maria Marketou and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. ANMCO position paper E-health integration in cardiology clinical care framework.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mark Johan SchuuringDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-1852
Roderick Willem TreskesDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-6005
Teresa CastielloDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, King's College London, Croydon Health Service London, London, UK.
Magnus Thorsten JensenSteno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Ruben Casado-ArroyoDepartment of Cardiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3876-6074
Lis NeubeckCentre for Cardiovascular Health, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-1034
Alexander R LyonCardio-Oncology Service, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-840X
Nurgul KeserFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology-Istanbul, Istanbul Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-9913
Marcin RucinskiPoland, ESC Patient Forum, European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1265-1613
Maria MarketouCardiology Department, Heraklion University Hospital, Stavrakia, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-3430
Ekaterini LambrinouDepartment of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-8861
Maurizio VolterraniCardiology Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, 00163 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-9213
Loreena HillSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-0936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2021 European Society of Cardiology guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) and the 2023 Focused Update include recommendations on the pharmacotherapy for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV HF with reduced ejection fraction. However, multinational data from the EVOLUTION HF study found substantial prescribing inertia of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in clinical practice. The cause was multifactorial and included limitations in organizational resources. Digital solutions like digital consultation, digital remote monitoring, digital interrogation of cardiac implantable electronic devices, clinical decision support systems, and multifaceted interventions are increasingly available worldwide. The objectives of this Clinical Consensus Statement are to provide (i) examples of digital solutions that can aid the optimization of prescription of GDMT, (ii) evidence-based insights on the optimization of prescription of GDMT using digital solutions, (iii) current evidence gaps and implementation barriers that limit the adoption of digital solutions in clinical practice, and (iv) critically discuss strategies to achieve equality of access, with reference to patient subgroups. Embracing digital solutions through the use of digital consults and digital remote monitoring will future-proof, for example alerts to clinicians, informing them of patients on suboptimal GDMT. Researchers should consider employing multifaceted digital solutions to optimize effectiveness and use study designs that fit the unique sociotechnical aspects of digital solutions. Artificial intelligence solutions can handle larger data sets and relieve medical professionals' workloads, but as the data on the use of artificial intelligence in HF are limited, further investigation is warranted.

Indexed as

Digital healthGDMTHeart failurePharmacotherapyRemote contactUp-titration

Identifiers

PMID39563907
PMCPMC11570396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.