ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2024
Nanoscale Generators for Tissue Healing: A Perspective.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Icariin-loaded GelMa hydrogel encapsulated potassium sodium niobate biomimetic piezoelectric scaffold regulates macrophage polarization to accelerate bone defect repair.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- LIPUS Responsive Dopamine-Modified PVDF Piezoelectric Nanofiber Membrane for Full-Thickness Skin Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroactive components can promote tissue healing and control neuronal activity with the support of the tissue environment and offer electrical impulses and biocompatible material habitats. Due to the increasing growth of portable electronics, it is imperative to generate tiny, lightweight power supply appliances with outstanding performance and sustainable energy conversion ability. In order to deal with the energy deficiency of electronic devices, self-powered systems based nanogenerators are committed to capturing ambient energy for electronic device consumption. Nanogenerator assemblies provide a range of benefits, including adjustable shape, flexibility, affordability, and transportability. As such, they represent a novel and intriguing area for biomedical investigation. In living organisms, bioelectrical mechanisms play an integral part in regulating the functions of cells and tissues. An essential component of electroactive assemblies includes self-powered nanogenerators. In conjunction with nanogenerators, biomedicine has contributed to the invention of medical devices based on self-powered system. Currently, one of the most significant energy-based technologies to guarantee the long-term functioning of implanted biomedical devices is the accumulation of biomechanical energy in vivo. This review covers the development of nanogenerators for biomedical applications. Piezoelectric and triboelectric materials, which could foster the evolution of potential applications in the field of bone regeneration and tissue engineering, are the primary focus of this review. These materials are electrically self-sustaining generators that encourage tissue repair involving osteogenic proliferation, differentiation, and microbial sterilization. Eventually, the discussion highlights the potential future scope and challenges related to the nanogenerators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.