Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563768›Full record

ReviewJournal of human kinetics2024

Gluteus Medius for Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability: Assessing Muscle Activity.

Lijiang Luan, Zhengliang Xia, Roger Adams, Charlotte Ganderton, Oren Tirosh, Doa El-Ansary, Adrian Pranata, Jia Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human kinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lijiang LuanSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-8002
Zhengliang XiaSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Roger AdamsDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charlotte GandertonDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Oren TiroshSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, Australia.
Doa El-AnsarySchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, Australia.
Adrian PranataDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Jia HanSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3071-420X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence has suggested that gluteus medius (GM) muscle activity may be critical for functional performance in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). This study aimed to systematically review the literature to determine whether there are differences in GM muscle activity between individuals with and without CAI. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, and PEDro databases was undertaken from the year of inception to 10 June 2024. Studies that investigated GM muscle activity during physical activities in healthy controls or copers and individuals with CAI were included. The quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality scale (NOS). After review, forty studies (1840 participants) were included; NOS scoring for the included studies ranged from 5/9 to 9/9 stars. GM activity was reported for seven activities: walking (14 studies), stance-transition (four studies), jump-landing (13 studies), perturbation (six studies), balance (four studies), cutting (three studies), and other functional exercises (seven studies). The outcome measures selected to examine each task varied across studies, and electromyography (EMG) results were inconsistent. Overall, although the quality of the available studies was generally high, there were substantial methodological differences, and the activity of GM muscles in CAI participants compared to controls was equivocal. A consensus on standardization of GM muscle activity assessment reporting should be established to guide future studies.

Indexed as

electromyographyfunctional performancephysical activitiessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39563768
PMCPMC11571473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.