ArticleJournal of human kinetics2024
Increasing Braking and Amortization Forces during the Countermovement Jump Does Not Necessarily Improve Jump Height.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Countermovement Jump Analysis as a Predictor of Overhead Pitching Velocity in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Article
- Physical Characteristics of Fast Roping in British Elite Law Enforcement Officers.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Individualized Training Programs Based on the Optimal Force-Velocity Relationship to Develop Athletes' Jump Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Review
- Effects of a 7-day step taper, training cessation, and retraining on lower body physical and morphological aspects in elite female ice hockey players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of altering the braking rate of force development (B-RFD) and amortization force (Amf) during countermovement jumps (CMJs) on CMJ height. Nineteen healthy men and women with training experience participated, performing six CMJ variations at different velocities (preferred and fast) and depths (knee angles: 60°, 90°, and 120°). The measured variables included CMJ height, B-RFD, Amf, and impulses during the early and latter halves of the concentric phase (EI and LI, respectively). A two-way analysis of variance was employed, along with a correlational analysis of the rates of change for each variable. Significant velocity and depth effects were observed for B-RFD and Amf (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant velocity effect on CMJ height. No significant correlations were observed between the rates of change in B-RFD and Amf with CMJ height. Additionally, a high or a very high correlation (r ≥ 0.67) was observed between the rate of change in B-RFD and Amf with the rate of change in EI, while a moderate negative correlation (r = -0.43 to -0.53) was found between the rate of change in EI and LI. These findings suggest that improvements in B-RFD and Amf were associated with improvements in EI, while improvements in EI led to a reduction in LI, and consequently, improvements in B-RFD and Amf were not associated with an increase in CMJ height. In other words, improvements in B-RFD and Amf did not necessarily contribute to improvements in CMJ height.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.