ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2024
Survey of learning-based approaches for robotic in-hand manipulation.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interactive imitation learning for dexterous robotic manipulation: challenges and perspectives-a survey.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human dexterity is an invaluable capability for precise manipulation of objects in complex tasks. The capability of robots to similarly grasp and perform in-hand manipulation of objects is critical for their use in the ever changing human environment, and for their ability to replace manpower. In recent decades, significant effort has been put in order to enable in-hand manipulation capabilities to robotic systems. Initial robotic manipulators followed carefully programmed paths, while later attempts provided a solution based on analytical modeling of motion and contact. However, these have failed to provide practical solutions due to inability to cope with complex environments and uncertainties. Therefore, the effort has shifted to learning-based approaches where data is collected from the real world or through a simulation, during repeated attempts to complete various tasks. The vast majority of learning approaches focused on learning data-based models that describe the system to some extent or Reinforcement Learning (RL). RL, in particular, has seen growing interest due to the remarkable ability to generate solutions to problems with minimal human guidance. In this survey paper, we track the developments of learning approaches for in-hand manipulations and, explore the challenges and opportunities. This survey is designed both as an introduction for novices in the field with a glossary of terms as well as a guide of novel advances for advanced practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.