Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563677›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2024

Clinically correlated dose of the amniotic membrane extract is superior to its transplantation in corneal wound healing.

Ilayda Korkmaz, Meltem Kocamanoglu, Mehmet Gurdal, Mesut Arici, Banu Yaman, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Nuri Yildirim, Ozlem Barut-Selver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilayda KorkmazEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey.
Meltem KocamanogluEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Ocular Surface Research Laboratory, Izmir, Turkey.
Mehmet GurdalEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Ocular Surface Research Laboratory, Izmir, Turkey.
Mesut AriciEge University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Izmir, Turkey.
Banu YamanEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Pathology, Izmir, Turkey.
Melis PalamarEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey.
Sait EgrilmezEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey.
Nuri YildirimEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozlem Barut-SelverEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the superiority of sterile lyophilized amniotic membrane extract (AME) prepared at a clinically correlated dose over amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in an experimental corneal wound model. Methods: AME was prepared from a pool of five amniotic membranes. After homogenizing the membranes, they were lyophilized and sterilized by gamma radiation to obtain sterile, lyophilized AME powder. The total protein amount and growth factor levels were measured in the AME samples. AME eye drops were prepared considering the protein concentration of the standard-size amniotic membrane weight used for transplantation, and this total amount was used as the daily dose. For the experimental animal corneal wound model, a full-thickness mechanical corneal epithelial defect was created in 15 eyes of 15 New Zealand rabbits. The rabbits were divided into four groups: Group 1: AME eye drop (n = 4 eyes), Group 2: AMT (n = 4 eyes), Group 3: preservation-free artificial tear (n = 4 eyes), and Group 4: control (n = 3 eyes). Daily anterior segment evaluation and photography were performed to determine the clinical efficacy of the AME. The rabbits were euthanized on day 7, and wound healing was examined histopathologically. Results: The total protein amount in the AME was 0.149 ± 0.01 mg/ml. The growth factor levels were as follows: EGF = 41.19, FGF = 43.11, HGF = 203.67, KGF = 328.03, NGF = 207.92, and TGF-β = 506.93 pg/ml AME. On clinical examination, the mean wound closure times in Groups 1, 3, and 4 were 2.75 ± 0.50 (2-3), 3.5 ± 1.0 (3-5), and 3.33 ± 1.52 (2-5) days, respectively ( Conclusions: AME is a liquid product that contains the essence of the amniotic membrane after homogenization and centrifugation. AME has the potential to overcome the disadvantages of AMT, such as surgery requirement and the limitation of postoperative objective clinical observation due to the semi-opaque nature of the amniotic membrane. Although, there are studies showing the advantages of AME over AMT in the literature, the preparation, preservation and sterilization of AME are still controversial. This study is specifically addressing the shortcomings of acquiring AME in the literature, such as minimizing inter-donor variability in AME by pooling amniotic membranes from different donors, lyophilizing AME to preserve its biochemical composition, and preventing infection transmission by using gamma sterilization. Herein, we observed that the AME prepared with this method contains high concentrations of growth factors. In the present study, the dose of AME was correlated with clinical use for the first time, and for the first time, the superiority of sterile lyophilized AME over AMT was clinically demonstrated in a corneal wound model. Furthermore, histopathological findings confirmed that AME seems to not only promote epithelial proliferation during wound healing but also prevent stromal keratocyte loss, inhibit inflammation and accelerate collagen remodeling.

Indexed as

AmnionWound HealingAnimalsCorneaCorneal InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalEpithelium, CornealFreeze DryingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsOphthalmic SolutionsRabbitsTissue ExtractsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsOphthalmic SolutionsTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID39563677
PMCPMC11575842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.