ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Biomechanical changes in the lumbar and hip joint after curved periacetabular osteotomy.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Phase Angle Decline and Functional Recovery Following Periacetabular Osteotomy: A One-Year Prospective Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Single-baseline virtual progression modeling of Crowe type I-III developmental dysplasia of the hip: a finite element study of stress-location migration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe alignment of the spine and pelvis significantly impacts overall body balance; therefore, alterations in hip and lumbar spine biomechanics following curved acetabular osteotomy (CPO) can help surgeons optimize acetabular correction. To achieve this goal, we conducted patient-specific finite element analyses to compare hip and lumbar disc contact pressure (CP) between patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and healthy individuals. Additionally, we examined the influence of CPO on the CP of both the hip and lumbar discs in patients with DDH.
methodsWe conducted finite element analyses of the hip and lumbar spine before and after CPO and compared them with those of a healthy human model. Subsequently, we simulated CPO on the preoperative model. Nonlinear contact analysis was employed to calculate the CP of the acetabular cartilage and lumbar discs during a single-leg stance.
resultsThe maximum and average acetabular CP in patients with DDH were 5.4 MPa and 4.5 MPa, respectively. The average CP for the five lumbar discs were 3 MPa, 2.5 MPa, 2 MPa, 3.5 MPa, and 4.4 MPa. In contrast, the maximum and average acetabular CP in normal subjects were 3.7 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, and the average CP of their lumbar discs were 1 MPa, 2 MPA, 1.88 MPa, 2.1 MPa, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. After CPO, the maximum and average CP of the hip decreased, as did the average CP of the lumbar discs. The maximum and average compressive stress of the acetabulum decreased to 3.79 MPa and 2.3 MPa, respectively, and the average compressive stress of the five intervertebral discs decreased to 1.96 MPa, 0.79 MPa, 0.78 MPa, 1.13 MPa, and 3.14 MPa, respectively.
conclusionOur finite element analysis indicated that CPO effectively normalizes hip contact pressure while reducing lumbar disc contact pressure. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the specific biomechanical mechanisms underlying these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.