Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563435›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2024

Trends and inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019.

Augustus Osborne, Camilla Bangura, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Augustus OsborneDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Basic Sciences, Njala University, PMB, Freetown, Sierra Leone. augustusosborne2@gmail.com.
Camilla BanguraDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Basic Sciences, Njala University, PMB, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahREMS Consultancy Services, Takoradi, Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the known benefits of modern contraceptives in preventing unwanted pregnancies and reducing unsafe abortions, their use remains low among women of reproductive age in several sub-Saharan African countries, including Sierra Leone. This study investigated the inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Sierra Leone based on data from 2008 to 2019.

methodsWe used data from the Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey data rounds (2008, 2013, and 2019). The World Health Organization's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (WHO's HEAT) software was used to calculate both simple measures; Difference (D) and Ratio (R) and complex measures of inequality: Population Attributable Risk (PAR) and Population Attributable Fraction (PAF). The inequality assessment was done for five stratifiers: age, economic status, level of education, place of residence, and sub-national province.

resultsThe study found that the prevalence of modern contraceptive use among women in Sierra Leone increased from 6.7% in 2008 to 20.9% in 2019. There was an increase in age-related inequality from a Difference of 5.9 percentage points in 2008 to 7.0 percentage points in 2019. PAF decreased from 5.7% in 2008 to 1.6% in 2019, indicating that the national average of modern contraceptive use would have increased by 5.7% in 2008 and 1.6% in 2019 in the absence of age-related inequalities. For economic status, the Difference decreased from 14.9 percentage points in 2008 to 9.9 percentage points in 2019. PAF decreased from 166.3% in 2008 to 23.3% in 2019, indicating that the national average of modern contraceptive use would have increased by 166.3% in 2008 and 23.3% in 2019 in the absence of economic-related inequalities. For education, the Difference decreased from 15.1 percentage points in 2008 to 12.4 percentage points in 2019. The PAF shows that the national average of modern contraceptive use would have reduced from 189.8%  in 2008 to 39.5% in 2019, in the absence of education-related inequality. With respect to place of residence, the Difference decreased from 10.4 percentage points in 2008 to 7.6 percentage points in 2019, and PAF decreased from 111.2% in 2008 to 23.0% in 2019. The decline in PAF indicates that the national average of modern contraceptive use would have increased by 111.2% in 2008 and 23.0% in 2019 without residence-related inequality. Provincial-related inequality decreased from a Difference of 15.5% in 2008 to 8.5% in 2019. The PAF results showed a decrease in inequality from 176.3% in 2008 to 16.7% in 2019, indicating that province would contribute 176.3% and 16.7% in 2008 and 2019 respectively to the national average of modern contraceptive use.

conclusionThe use of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Sierra Leone increased between 2008 and 2019 reflecting positive progress in reproductive health initiatives and access to family planning resources. The reductions in inequalities related to economic status, education, residence, and province indicate that efforts to promote equity in contraceptive access are yielding results, although age-related inequalities persist. To build on these advancements, it is recommended that policymakers continue to strengthen educational campaigns and healthcare services, particularly targeting younger women. Additionally, enhancing access to contraceptive methods through community-based programs and addressing socio-economic barriers will be crucial in further reducing inequalities and improving overall reproductive health outcomes in Sierra Leone.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSierra LeoneYoung AdultContraceptionDemographic health surveyHealthInequalityModernSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID39563435
PMCPMC11575033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.