Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563420›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

Integrating expert patients perspectives on the processes of engaging them in early medical education.

Jaimy Saif, Duane Mellor, David Rogers, Claire Stocker

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaimy SaifAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. j.saif@aston.ac.uk.
Duane MellorAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
David RogersExpert by experience, Birmingham, UK.
Claire StockerAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the practice of healthcare, a new paradigm has emerged that perhaps challenges traditional notions of patient-clinician relationships. This shift involves recognising the invaluable role of expert patients, individuals who possess first-hand experience of life with their specific health conditions or chronic illnesses. These individuals have gained deep practical insights, knowledge, and coping strategies through their personal journeys. Modern healthcare practice focusing on individualised care necessitates that patients and their experiences become integral to the education of future healthcare professionals, from the start of their learning journeys, steering us toward more compassionate and person-centred approaches. This communication article underscores the importance of developing structured, coordinated programs that involve patients in curriculum design, implementation, and evaluation. By fostering authentic partnerships, medical education can create richer learning environments that promote compassionate care and better prepare future healthcare professionals. Ultimately, embracing patient perspectives as integral to the educational process is essential for improving healthcare delivery and outcomes.

Indexed as

Expert patientsPerson-centred medical education

Identifiers

PMID39563420
PMCPMC11574981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.